While it’s widely known that full electric cars produce zero tailpipe emissions, and higher-mileage hybrid and gas-powered models performing admirably in this regard, there’s more to evaluating a given model’s full environmental impact than its localized carbon discharge. Rather, the ACEEE’s ratings take into consideration the “cradle to grave” impact a given model will have on the environment.
In addition to the greenest and meanest rankings, the ACEEE compared three models that are offered in both conventionally-powered and full electric versions to demonstrate how each fares with regard to environmental impact. The aforementioned battery-powered MINI Cooper SE is predicted to cause 46% less environmental damage than its ICE-powered alternative. The Volvo XC40 EV is estimated to be 30% more environmentally friendly than its gas/electric hybrid equivalent.
In addition, the full-size Ford F-150 Lightning pickup is said to be 38% less harmful than its gas-powered alternative. It should be noted, however, that the electric version is far from being among the greenest rides on the road, with a Green Score of only 49, compared to 38 with the standard F-150.
And because not everyone necessarily wants or is able to own an electric car or a hybrid, the ACEEE identifies “Greener Choices” in each vehicle class, including those running exclusively on gasoline. The latter include the Mitsubishi Mirage with a Green Score of 59 out of 100, the Kia Soul , BMW Z4 sDrive30i , and the Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 ., with Green Scores and EDX cost estimates noted:Full electric with a Green Score of 67 and an EDX of $0.
I turned my mini into a flower bed