that we’ll still have individuals owning such cars, but in any case, if you have a robot driver then potentially you wouldn’t need to invest in a car per se. You might instead buy a robot driver and use it whenever you need to go for a ride, perhaps borrowing a friend’s car, or using a ridesharing car that isn’t yet driverless, and so on.A true self-driving car has pretty much one purpose, it is a car and used for transportation.
There are more aspects that arise as benefits, but let’s not ignore the other side of the coin, namely the potential disadvantages or drawbacks.A robot driver is not necessarily a cure-all.For a self-driving car, the guts of the tech are hidden within the car and hopefully going to work reliably. A robot driver that you are pulling into or out of a car is bound to get a lot of wear-and-tear. Do you really want a robot driver that is maybe in a state of disrepair driving your car? Don’t think so.
Sir why you don’t go to Kashmir where-humanity needs your response. Regards buddy
Isn't Forbes supposed to be smart? This is something my friend James would say, and James is a fucking idiot.
I have to say amazingly stupid idea.
Most humans can't drive so how can they hope to program a machine to do it?
Is this not a really stupid article?
It's the same thing.
But... a self driving car is a robot that can drive... I'd rather have the self driving car so that way my robot jeeves can stay home and clean things.
same difference
Isn't a self driving car a robot that can drive?
I want both elonmusk